Comments on: Rambling Review – Wright & McGill Grindstone Reel Bag https://azwanderings.com/rambling-review-wright-mcgill-grindstone-reel-bag/ ...fishing, hunting, and roaming the Southwest Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:15:29 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: Howard Levett https://azwanderings.com/rambling-review-wright-mcgill-grindstone-reel-bag/#comment-23923 Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:13:25 +0000 http://azwanderings.com/?p=11922#comment-23923 I’m also a big fan of WM. I had a tackle pack that I ended up losing on my local water. The pack was made similar to the reel bag, so I’d have to say that I agree with your assessment. Pretty close to the others but not quite, but good enough for most uses.

]]>
By: Jay https://azwanderings.com/rambling-review-wright-mcgill-grindstone-reel-bag/#comment-23788 Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:03:44 +0000 http://azwanderings.com/?p=11922#comment-23788 In reply to azwanderings.

Ben,
Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I think you gave a perfect answer to my question. I figured it had to be some detail about material or construction… even though I know it’s sometimes difficult to describe exactly why one product feels better than another.

]]>
By: azwanderings https://azwanderings.com/rambling-review-wright-mcgill-grindstone-reel-bag/#comment-23732 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:08:32 +0000 http://azwanderings.com/?p=11922#comment-23732 In reply to Jay.

Jay,
Thanks so much for the comment. My opinion is based mainly on handling both the Fishpond and the W&M cases. In my opinion, I think the Fishpond case is a bit stouter material along with with a waterproof bottom and a bit more padding. I like the extra external pocket, and I prefer the mesh pockets on the inside vs. the plastic pocket on the inside of the W&M. I think the shoulder strap on the Fishpond is nicer and higher quality material and padding. I took a look at the Simms reel case as well and liked the extra pockets and construction of the bag, but ultimately narrowed my search to the Fishpond and the W&M briefcases.

As with all my reviews I try to provide my honest opinion, whether I am provided the product by the manufacturer to test, or I purchase the item with my own hard earned money, as is the case with the W&M case. Bottom line, I really do like the W&M case and feel that for the money it is the best deal on the market. I have recommended this bag to several friends over the Fishpond, because I don’t believe the extra frills are worth the money on a reel bag. I did my own personal research before spending my money, and knew what I was buying. I know it will last me for many years and will serve its purpose well.

I hope that clarifies what I meant and that you understand that I wasn’t trying to take a shot at a friend. Take care.

Ben

]]>
By: Jay https://azwanderings.com/rambling-review-wright-mcgill-grindstone-reel-bag/#comment-23729 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:33:17 +0000 http://azwanderings.com/?p=11922#comment-23729 Like many fly fishers, one of my first rods I ever cast was an W&M Eagle Claw Featherlight… so I admit to having a personal bias about the company. I’m a big fan of W&M, so I want their products to be good… even though I know they’ve produced some garbage over the years. I think you need to elaborate on “some differences in quality” and “overall not as nice quality as some of the competitors.” Please explain how this bag is inferior to the competition aside from the big names having a superior price tag. Sorry, but I gotta do my part to defend an old friend.

]]>